Trust in AI through Monitoring, Evaluation and Autodidact Learning

SuperviseAI keeps constant track of how your AI solution is performing through state-of-the-art, LLM-as-a-judge and human-in-the-loop technology, accessible with intuitive tools and dashboard visualizations.
Request a Demo

Our Differentiation: Certified AI Agent Quality

Know what your AI agent does with certainty

Our roots in nuanced, subjective, and high-stakes judgments (beyond “routine” labeling) give you safety-grade accuracy with less human review because we target the right samples.

Visualize AI agent health in dashboards

Gain instant clarity into how your AI agents perform, behave, and improve with live metrics that turn invisible risks into actionable insights.

Auditor-ready from day one

Versioned suites, evidence bundles, and clear error case analysis without months of bespoke work.

Automate AI agent learning processes

Continuously optimize your AI agents with closed-loop feedback and reinforcement learning that scales quality without manual retraining.

Why SuperviseAI?

Trusted Quality Benchmarks

Our LLM-as-a-Judge evaluations identify agent failures in nuanced, reference-free contexts (not just pass/fail code checks).

Human Oversight

We use human feedback where it matters. Failure mode prioritization, failure sampling, and accessible  review tooling optimizes human misalignment feedback.

Real-Time, Actionable Reports

We provide full transparency with real-time dashboards, error case analysis, and trend analysis to clarify agent performance over time.

Ongoing, Automated Improvement

From monitoring to continuous quality improvement, we close the loop through a reinforcement feedback learning cycle powered by error case analysis and human assessment context.

Creating Trust with Quality Measurement

SuperviseAI provides incident rates (safety, leakage, hallucinations), grounded-answer scores, time-to-adjudication, and clear error cases that measure your AI agent quality.

With SuperviseAI, you gain clear visibility into every action your AI takes so you can trust its performance, correct mistakes instantly, and sleep well knowing your AI agents are always under watch.

Tailored Evaluation Out-of-the-box

SuperviseAI creates custom evaluations automatically for your agents, based on agent behavior policy context. Specific failure modes map to evaluation categories such as safety / toxicity checks, PII/PHI leakage and redaction verification, prompt-injection and jailbreak resistance, hallucination and grounding assessments, action guardrails for allow/deny/approval, brand, sentiment, and suitability for UGC or ads, as well as bias, harassment, denial, and frustration detection.

Content moderation scorecard

What SuperviseAI Does

1. Always-On Quality & Risk Monitoring

Continuous, policy-driven evaluations across multi-turn, multi-tool and multimodal AI agent flows. Configurable alerts notify you of performance drift so you can minimize regression impact.

2. LLM-as-a-Judge, Reconciled with Humans

Policy-driven classifiers judge identify failure modes and related quality measures that are most important to your agent performance, like completeness, tone, bias, and safety / no-harm. All evaluation decisions include human-readable, step-by-step rationales for transparency.

3. Human Expert Adjudication

SuperviseAI routes high priority agent failures to expert reviewers (your team members, outsourced to TrustLab or to a 3rd party) for calibration, then automatically applies disagreements to improve evaluation accuracy and update error case analysis.

4. Reinforcement Learning and Reporting

Updated failure modes, scorecards and datasets are self-serve accessible and exportable so you know how your AI agent’s quality is measuring up, your team has the insights they need to improve quality, and your compliance/oversight reports are always current.

Diagram step 1: Send your content to the ModerateAI API.Diagram step 1: Send your content to the ModerateAI API.

Where SuperviseAI Shines

Financial Services

Tom Siegel

Employee copilot and customer-facing chatbot supervision with audit-ready artifacts.

Healthcare

Tom Siegel

Monitoring and evaluating AI output for personalized treatment plans and care coordination.

Public Sector & Regulated Industries

Tom Siegel

Continuous, policy-mapped evaluations with HITL oversight.

UGC Platforms & Advertisers

Tom Siegel

Policy violation decisions with appeals to reduce over-blocking.

Agentic Startups & Enterprise Teams

Tom Siegel

Quality monitoring (accuracy, consistency, safety), drift alerts, and improvement loops as you scale agents.

How to Use SuperviseAI

SuperviseAI empowers teams to confidently deploy and manage AI agents by providing continuous oversight, performance evaluation, and real-time learning. It helps you ensure that your AI systems act responsibly, deliver consistent results, and comply with safety and privacy standards.

Test & Integrate SuperviseAI in Minutes

1. Connect your agents via API/MCP

2. Select quality evaluation suites

3. Observe LLM judge disagreements

4. Adjudicate with expert reviewers

5. Leverage judge+human feedback

6. See proof of quality improvement

Diagram step 1: Send your content to the ModerateAI API.

Trust through Evidence: Metrics that Matter

Quality & Safety

• Efficiency
• Hallucination
• Policy Compliance

Reliability & Performance

• Jailbreak Resistance
• Resolution
• Tool Usage

Human Review Quality

• Reviewer Consistency
• Disagreement Rates
• Time-to-adjudication

Monitoring & Compliance

• Drift
• Regression alerts
• Performance Trends

Key Capabilities

• Policy-as-Code Engine: Versioned policies, taxonomies, and thresholds with change history and stakeholder sign-off.
• Evaluator Orchestrator: Batch/CI runs, scheduled jobs, sampling plans, drift detection, and “LLM-judge vs. human” reconciliation.
• HITL Workbench: Calibration sets, κ/IRR, dispute handling, annotator QA metrics, bias dashboards.
• Data Provenance Ledger: Source & consent tracking, dataset datasheets, acceptance criteria, and immutable logs.
• Optimization Loops: Preference data capture, reinforcement learning hooks to raise scores, not just measure them.

Content moderation scorecardContent moderation scorecard

Plan Options

Pro

5 Evaluation Suites

3 Environments

100k Evals/Mo

Human Feedback Tooling

Dashboards and Alerts

Enterprise

Custom Evaluation Suites

Unlimited Environments

Unlimited Evals/Mo

On-Prem or VPC Deployment

Forward Deployed Eng Support

Frequently Asked Questions

Which industries or business sectors are currently seeing the greatest benefits or measurable impact from using your approach?
In which types of situations or workflows does the human feedback provide more value than relying only on automated systems?
Is it possible to begin our collaboration with a regulated use case to ensure compliance and audit readiness from the start?
How are your evaluation judges or scoring methods different from the standard or generic LLM metrics typically used in model benchmarking?

Ready to de-risk your AI
agents and prove quality?